Dr
Neil Béchervaise
NB
Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd
From
crib to school: the importance of reading to babies
©
Neil Béchervaise
In
1984, Arthur Applebee, in an editorial Musing in Research
in the Teaching of English (18.1) complained that English educators
were strong on observation, description and conjecture but short on
taking up the challenge of expounding theories which might be used
as a basis for understanding the observations we make. Applebee's
cris ce couer has implications which are echoing with increasing
intensity through the halls of an increasingly literacy-conscious
fraternity of policy-makers and on an international scale.
The
purpose of this paper is to propose a psychodynamic theory of readership
and, subsequently, literacy as it is initiated and confirmed from
earliest childhood. Derived from ongoing research initiated in the
early 1980s and first reported in 1986, this paper describes mechanisms
by which reader development incorporates and substantiates discriminatory
structures. The paper then explores the impact of critical emotional
events and physiological conditions on reading development. In conclusion,
implications for literacy policy-makers, family care providers and
early childhood educators are outlined.
INTRODUCTION
By
now, we are all familiar with the notion that, despite several vocal
detractors, reading is a natural activity (Williams, 1990), that
if we read to children then they will grow up to be happy, healthy
readers. The popular media support the notion; writers as diverse
in their approach as Snowball (1982), Trelease (1984) and Meek (1988)
reinforce the notion and the findings of researchers such as Clark
(1976), Applebee (1978), Cronin (1986) and Toomey (1987, 1993) appear
to confirm the notion. Unfortunately, it is becoming increasingly
evident that the notion is no more than just that - a notion.
The
process of reading acquisition is, quite clearly, a very complex
operation. One which, I propose, depends substantially on the development
of reading schema for both its initiation and its subsequent development.
THE
CROSS-GENERATIONAL STUDY OF FAMILIES
In
1986, I provided an interim report on a case-study exploration of
seven families over three generations in which I was seeking to
isolate factors which influenced the changes observable in reading
habits over generations (Bechervaise, 1987). In that paper I hypothesized
that attitudes to reading might be influenced by:
*attitudinal
changes to education arising from developing socio- economic aspiration
in parents;
*the effects of loneliness or deprivation and
*the effects of intense personal experience.
The research took place within what would usually be termed a white,western,
middle-class, literacy-based society. The study involved families
for whom three generations could speak for themselves and did not
attempt to differentiate or represent the families by class, education
or economic circumstance. In consequence, the effect of a broad
disparity between families and across generations of families was
included among the identifiable factors influencing reading.
In
this study, the oldest respondents ranged in age from their sixties
to early eighties while the youngest was fourteen. The majority
of respondents lived in south-eastern Australia though individuals
in Canada and England were also interviewed. to complete the family
records. As previously stated, the socio-economic class of the sample
was widely disparate; as was the educational standard - from self-taught
semi-literate to university qualified; and the social context -
from rural poverty to urban affluence.
The
study was predicated in the observation that there has been a significant
shift in the educational standard in most westernised countries
this century and that this is clearly evident in Australia. Accepting
the innate importance of home environment and early childhood experience,
the study sought to identify factors which had been influential
in promoting changes in attitude to reading. In other words, were
there factors, events in the history of a family which could be
seen as having changed the response of its members to literature?
The
findings clearly demonstrated the significance of a number of key
factors among which the impact of the economic depression of the
1930s, leading - as it did for Australia - into the second world
war, was probably the most important. One of the least directly
important appears to have been schooling. A prÚcis of the findings
can be summarised into the following ten observations.
1.
The presence in the home of books which have been, and are, read
by the parents is a more positive influence on the development of
readership in children than any other single factor. The establishment
of an observably reader-oriented environment provides the child
with a pattern of living which inevitably involves books. From which
it follows that:
2. Families that buy books for personal reading tend to produce
families of readers.
3. In periods of family stress, children tend to use books to support
the prevalent family attitude to reading. If the family are readers
then reading produces solace but if the family are non-readers then
books may be targeted as a source of increased tension.
4. Exclusion of a younger child from what might be seen as a family
reading session may result in unreasonable feelings of deprivation
and isolation. This sense of exclusion can be initiated at a very
early age and, in consequence, it is worth reiterating the observation
that babies of three and four months are quite capable of responding
to being told stories (Ward, 1982).
5. School students who come from homes which are reading hostile
and who have little or no motivation to read can be turned on to
books by teachers who persevere - but, it is unlikely that the newly
initiated reader will learn to discriminate better from lesser quality
literature, because a framework for discrimination has never been
established and so, no procedure exists for the reader to process
the material being read. This point is expanded upon later in this
paper later but it is this, I believe, which explains the phenomenal
success of the pot-boiler novels, the pseudo-historical novels of
ever-increasing dimension and the proliferation of romance genre
titles observed by Gilbert & Taylor (1991), et al.
6. Events beyond the control of teachers - and often of families
- are responsible for the development of idiosyncratic attitudes
toward reading but the family remains the most potent single force
in the initiation of reading.
7. Changes in the social aspiration of parents for their children
are unlikely to produce changes in reading patterns regardless of
whether the new aspiration requires increased reading. Upwardly
mobile parents tend to believe that because they plague their children
with the importance of reading, this will affect the child's attitude.
Lack of parental modelling effectively foils such an outcome.
8. Positive changes in reading pattern take three generations to
substantiate. In the case of a non-reading family, the decision
to change the family reading pattern may be initiated by presenting
reading as a valuable pursuit to the second generation. The up-take
of reading by the initiating generation will not spontaneously generate
any deep or abiding satisfaction with reading unless it already
exists and coffee-table or pulp genre reading is the most likely
outcome of the initiation.
The
second generation reader, being read to and encouraged to read but
with little evident support for the exercise (no books in the house,
no observably positive attitude to reading) will accept the value
of reading and of books without any need to establish a framework
with which to process the reading. Nevertheless, this generation
will present a positive reading model for their offspring though
the quality of the reading may still draw censure from a puritanical
literature teacher.
In
consequence of this history, the third generation reader is, of
course, born into a home in which books are evident, in which the
pleasures of reading are both extolled and observably displayed.
In a reading environment, the need to read is unquestioned, the
need for a framework within which to process the reading becomes
essential and discriminatory reading becomes a part of living -
the notion that reading is a natural activity, as Williams (1990)
observes, is supported in the literary household.
9.
Negative changes in reading attitudes also take three generations
to substantiate but the process is by no means as certain. Readers
are harder to un-make than they are to make (despite some fleeting
feelings to the contrary when we try to encourage our less willing
readers) and evidence of reading as a positive pursuit is difficult
to suppress in a home where it is valued. Nevertheless, association
of reading with traumatic experience - the death of a parent, particular
unpleasantry (incest) - or with an ongoing traumatic association
such as bitterness between parents may be sufficient to extinguish
the positive response.
10. While some people read to define reality, others read to establish
that there is a viable alternative to reality - albeit a vicarious
and fictional alternative. Few of these read science fiction and
fantasy, more read romance and mystery stories.
Such
observations as these require explanation and there is no clear
evidence that existing theories of reading acquisition and development
provide satisfactory explanation.
BONDING
BABIES WITH BOOKS
It
has become increasingly evident that parental influence during early
childhood is significant in determining later behaviour and attitudes.
Indeed, such influence is now regularly entered in mitigation during
criminal proceedings. The childhood victim of sexual molestation,
of alcoholic parents, of wife-beating husbands is accepted as having
been traumatised during a psychologically vulnerable stage of development
and of having diminished control over.their later behaviour as a
result of this early patterning.
The
presumption upon which this diminished responsibility is predicated
is that there is a psychological bonding or imprinting which occurs
between babies and their primary care-givers which fundamentally
influences all of their future development.
A
similar argument may be developed to describe many of the more positive
but equally influential actions and emotions experienced during
childhood. The modelling of nurturing behaviour with dolls, the
tendency to aspire to similar occupations, to similar marital status,
to similar educational experience are commonly observed bonding
resonses.
We
understand increasingly how and why reading is important, how storying
is important. What we still have little comprehension of is the
essential nature of early storying if later development is to occur.
The works of Boomer and Spender (1976), Clark (1976), Applebee (1978)
and Trelease (1984) strongly suggest that storying, how a story
is, begins very early in a child's development, in the pre-speech
stage certainly. But it is the determined work of writers and researchers
such as Chall (1967), Chan (1974), Ferriero and Teberosky (1982),
Wells and Nicholls(1985) and Meek (1989) which suggests possible
mechanisms by which this might occur.
A
young baby in a nursing mother's arms usually learns quickly to
associate mother with food. [It should be noted that this is
a learned experience and that some babies do not learn as quickly
as others how to suckle]. The knowledge is rapidly expanded
to include the association of mother's voice with the immediacy
of food. Mother, through the agency of her voice represents a source
for the removal of discomfort (hunger, in this case) even before
the baby can properly focus its eyes to receive an accurate image
of the provider. Mother's voice is substantiated as a source of
comfort during the extended periods in which she cleans, bathes,
carries, talks to and plays with the infant.
This
initial association of the voice with the removal of discomfort,
with the satisfaction of primary needs, establishes the initial
relationship of speaker with audience which is later fundamental
to the success of the storyteller.
As
the comforting, caring adult/parent continues to nurture the developing
infant, the rules of storying are further established. While the
adult/parent carer is engaged in various tasks, baby is present.
The carer talks to baby, holds baby, reads to baby. Carer/baby bonds
are established through the agency of the carer's voice in association
with the provision of comfort while tonal variation rather than
specific content determines early comprehension.
The
development of the bonding involves, as Piaget (1952) proposed,
an initially continual and undirected testing. Crying brings the
voice. The voice moves through a sequence of events designed to
establish the reason for crying and satisfy the need. As the needs
become differentiated, the crying becomes similarly specific and
the carer can identify the cry with the need. Boomer and Spender(1976)
describe a child lying in bed practising sound combinations, trying
on the sounds of syllables and words, testing for meaning and for
pleasant association with the day's events. In simple Piagetian
terms this testing corresponds to the play stage wherein the exemplars
of a concept are played with long before any idea of their future
usefulness in ordering the world is established.
Piaget's
proposal, however, provides no mechanism for development within
the play stage and provides no acceptable means for the child to
order activity, consciously or unconsciously, to pass beyond the
stage. One is left to believe that perhaps the development is physiological,
maybe maturational? However we order it, Piaget's development appears
to be hierarchical but accession of the hierarchy is unexplained.
The
theory expounded here submits that the development is ordered, that
the ordering occurs to satisfy needs, that the needs of the reader
are needs for order and the hierarchy is determined by the order
in which the needs are met to reduce immediate discomfort. Once
the carer/baby bonding has been established - through the agency
of the carer's voice and physical proximity and on the basis of
the carer's facility for removing discomfort - the characteristics
which establish readership begin to emerge.
The
observations of Ferriero and Teberosky (1982) that children in the
pre-reading stage can identify the actions of reading and even discern
the likelihood of a text deriving from a newspaper or a storybook
support Applebee's (1978) proposition that children learn the way
stories are by hearing them read. But Ferriero and Teberosky's (1982)
observations go further to imply that the toddler learns to associate
the type of story with the type of book - a point which is consistent
with the concerns of Luke and Freebody (1990) for a socio-culturally
directed pedagogy.
Applebee
(1978) observed both the development of storying and the development
of language in children but, like Wells (1981), he did not take
the step which he himself demanded (Applebee, 1984), of suggesting
a mechanism whereby these are internalised and ordered by the child.
In
proposing such a mechanism here, it is assumed, initially at least,
that the baby is physically and mentally healthy and that bonding
between carer and baby is occurring without apparent problems (the
bonding is, in fact, a prior condition for learning from that adult).
A secondary bonding, of the baby with the book, can now be established.
The
carer reading a story from the book becomes associated by the baby
with a sense of comfort and well-being established in the initial
carer/baby bonding. The book now becomes the source of stories which
are associated with close carer presence and comfort and thus, books
become associated with comfort. This triadic association between
carer, baby and book is established through repetition and, ultimately,
it becomes practical to leave the baby with the book as a source
of story in a similar way to leaving the baby with a favorite toy.
The
observation that babies will sit with books and make story noises
in imitation of the sounds of a story provides further confirmation
that this association occurs. That they also come to identify with
the print as the source of the story and try to write their own
story on the book is often less appreciated by carers who miss the
connection between the two. This point has recently been most clearly
articulated by Protherough (1993) in her work on the apparent interference
of pictures in the peception of text among early readers.
In
this model, it is accepted that the apparent bonding between carer
and book need only be illusory. The book, in the early stages of
the baby's development may not even be a story book. If, as a traditional
role example, mother is carrying her baby on her hip as she reads
a recipe aloud and prepares a cake, she may be seen to be telling
a story from a book. The use of the book to determine mother's action
becomes clear in the following dialogue between mother and baby,
Tammy. Mother [M] is holding both Tammy on her left hip
and a recipe book in her left hand
M.
Oooh, look at the lovely cake. [points to picture in recipe
book]
Shall we make a cake?
What do we need?
Well, first we need an egg Where are the eggs? In the refrigerator.[goes
to frig and gets egg. Returns to bench]
And then we need [Runs finger down recipe] ... some flour.
Where is the flour? [moves to cupboard] That's right. In
the cupboard.
In
this example the content is clearly less important for the baby
than the association developing between mother, baby and the book.
In an alternative example, the carer - essentially a non-reader
herself - believes that babies should be read to. Having little
knowledge or experience of the reading level of a baby, she sits
the baby on her knee and reads aloud from a women's magazine. The
baby, unconcerned with books and stories at this stage of its development,
can only associate what she is seeing and hearing with the source,
her mother. Since the mother is providing warmth and contact with
her baby, the baby comes to associate warmth and contact with both
the mother and the magazine (book).
Reinforcement
of the triadic association requires sufficient positive experience
to establish the book as the source of the story (Miller and Gildea,
1987). The existence of the story must come to be seen as pre-ordained
by the presence of the book and much of the success of this association
requires the presence of books in the home. The ownership of books
becomes a necessary condition for further reinforcement of the validity
of the association. If the home book presence is to remain credible
books must not only be seen, they must be seen to have permanence
and they must be seen to be used, and thus useful, by the primary
carers.
The
voice of the nurturing carer, the comfort provided and the presence
of the book become an integral triad, where the presence of comfort
and, at bed-time at least, the presence of the carer may come to
evoke the demand for a book. The calming effect of placing a book
within reach of a distressed baby demonstrates the efficacy of this
mechanism. And if this triadic bonding with books is established
during babyhood then the fundamental first criterion for readership
[literacy] has been established - stories are for enjoying.
The
model is beguiling in its simplicity. Baby, book, caring adult.
A triadic bonding. Very elegant. Unfortunately, while the model
provides an important initial understanding of the process by which
babies come to acquire an enjoyment of stories, the observable failures
of this bonding to occur need explanation. In fact, it appears,
the main short-coming of the theory relates to its most obvious
element - the baby bonds to the voice of the story, not to the written
text. While an association with story may be initiated through the
conjunction of the book and the voice, the association does not
necessitate a further link between the story and the script from
which it derives.
Two
simple examples serve to illustrate the point:
1.
Hugh appears to have failed to develop the triadic association proposed
despite the fact that he was read to by his mother and despite the
fact that he comes from a family of readers.
What
sets Hugh apart from others is that he is a great storyteller. Hugh,
as an adult, reads books indiscriminately but he doesn't enjoy reading
- he only knows that he should (he is an English teacher). Hugh,
however, has one further feature which is worthy of note, he wears
thick spectacles. It was not always so. His sight defect wasn't
diagnosed until he went to school. In fact, Hugh has a significant
sight defect and he cannot see print on a page without his glasses.
He cannot even see the pictures comprehensibly.
Hugh's
background would suggest that he should be a reader. He now is.
But his physical defect, his inability to associate print with story,
has resulted in his associating voice with story.
2.
Jarrod is 15 years old, a conscientious and able student with an
abiding interest in film and television. An avid and unapologetic
comic reader, Jarrod is, nevertheless, a capable text reader. But
he is an unwilling reader. He reads what he has to, he reads at
acceptable speed and without obvious comprehension problems. Jarrod
aspires to becoming a lighting designer and to work in film and
television.
Jarrod's
mother and father insist that they read most assiduously to him
when he was a baby and still treasure the books that he found most
pleasing.
Like
Hugh, Jarrod's early childhood background suggests that he should
be a reader and, in fact, he is. But he reads the pictures rather
than the print.
Further
exploration reveals that Jarrod was born with club feet and that
he was operated on to correct the condition soon after birth. The
operation was successful but the convalescent period was extended
and so painful that he could not be nursed. His early reading experience
consisted of mother and father taking turns to read to Jarrod as
he lay in his cot while they held the book over the side and pointed
to the pictures. Notwithstanding the traumatic associations between
books and carers which this might have established, Jarrod has developed
an association with the pictures and their colour combinations rather
than with the print from which the stories derived.
A
number of similar "mis-bondings" confirm the view that the simple
triadic model first proposed needs amendment to account for the
variations which arise when the subjects involved in the triad are
not healthily and (in the literary tradition) normally bonded with
books.
The
revision required does not interfere with the essentially triadic
nature of the association but it does require revision of the description
of both story and storyteller.
In
defiance of our traditional views, beginning learners may accept
their story from voice, from print, or from visual image. The book
may be seen as containing sensible pictures and some black marks
on the page, it may be seen as containing print or it may not be
seen as the source of the story at all. Similarly, the story may
derive from print, from a human voice, from the radio or from the
television screen.
The
importance of the association made will be quite clear to us as
readers but it is far from clear to many parents and to their children
when they attend school and experience failures which are otherwise
inexplicable.
CULTURAL
BACKGROUND AND LITERARY DEVELOPMENT
It
is now, I hope, well established that lack of success at school
does not necessarily derive from a negative attitude towards education,
paradoxical as this may seem. As Sutcliffe (1982) observes when
speaking of black children and their education in Britain, ...the
will to succeed in school was a strong asset that West Indians brought
with them to British classrooms. Respect for education is widespread
and traditional in the [Caribbean] islands. Unfortunately,
school failure is just as widespread ... brought about by overcrowding
and lack of equipment, and an education system that up until the
present has been biased against the cultural identity of the child
. (Sutcliffe, 1982:74)
Recent
educational 'initiatives' in England, at least, appear to have further
substantiated this bias. Sutcliffe further observes that development
of confidence and fluency is fostered in the culture, not only in
informal meetings but also in a variety of other settings including
the church and concludes that such oral fluency "ought to be transferable
to school work [because] Important growth points for education
are narrative, drama and poetry" (Sutcliffe, 1982:74).
In
noting the orientation towards oral proficiency, Sutcliffe substantiates
the observations recorded in Heath's (1983) Ways with Words. Heath
also notes the concern of her communities for the educational success
of their children but, in observing their lack of success, she identifies
pre-school literacy training with educational achievement. Heath's
Roadville and Trackton residents want educational, literary oriented
success but they do not associate, do not bond, their children with
books. Similarly, the Australian Aboriginal people in repeated submissions
to government committees and in both formal and informal submissions
have indicated
...
that they want their children to be able to speak, read and write
English. This is because they accept that they live in a society
alien to their traditional culture, in which their children must
grow up and compete. (Ruddock, 1985:93)
but,
again, the Australian aboriginal culture is an oral culture. The
likelihood of achieving a bonding with books remains minimal. Which
necessarily leads to a rather painful observation.
The
literature-based structure of the western education system positively
discriminates against children deriving from oral -based cultures.
In
a period when governments are stressing the need for more and better
education and Australia remains the only country in the South-Pacific
region with a National Language Planning policy, we are faced with
an impossible conundrum: the style of education we are offering
to a greater number of children than have ever been offered education
is contradictory to the style of learning of the children we are
offering it to. For an oral-based culture we are offering a largely
anglo-centric literature based learning experience.
And
we don't understand why it isn't working?
In
Australia today, as throughout the world, we have faster, more efficient
methods of doing practically everything except educate our population
for life in the 'clever country'. We keep revising our education
systems to cope with the increased influx of migrants and refugees;
we keep organising committees to arrive at consensus decisions as
to how we can improve the quality of education, of life itself;
but we refuse to recognise that the machine we are driving is inappropriate
to the conditions of the road, that bonding with the story is not
bonding with the book and that just because a story can be written
in a book in a literary form does not mean that it came from, or
even belongs in a book.
We
hold steadfastly to the post-Gutenberg belief that written knowledge
is the only worthy knowledge and that those whose values are not
aligned with our own are not only deficient but probably subversive.
We pay scant attention to the self-evident fact that individuals
whom we often require to be at least bilingual before we will teach
them the literacy forms of their most recently acquired language,
have already established their intellectual credentials and should,
perhaps, be educated by alternative procedures if they do not seem
to take instantly and irreversibly to literature-based instruction.
We represent a standard Australian English as a benchmark for academic
success and test fluency in this undefined language variant by almost
exclusive prescription of written examinations.
CONCLUSIONS
The
purpose of this paper has been to highlight what I see to be one
of the most significant problems facing not only English educators
but Education itself as we proceed through the last decade of the
twentieth century. I do not have answers to the problem but I do
have some suggestions. And they are all based in the belief with
which I have approached this paper from the beginning:
All
children have the right to an education which will fit them for
success in the society to which they aspire.
Unfortunately,
not all children derive from a common background. The belief that
they can be educated in the same way is demonstrably untenable.
The on again, off again National English Framework provides a coherent
approach to the development of English education in Australia, nevertheless,
education systems being what they are and doing what they do in
the way they do it, are unlikely to be able to muster the flexibility
which acceptance of this observation demands. Instead, therefore,
they will have to accommodate to the changes being thrust upon them
by their changing and increasingly complex clientele. And this is
likely to be a long and painful process.
In
the meantime, as English educators, we have a responsibility to
respond more quickly to what we know about how children learn and
the diversity of styles in which they do so. Acceptance of the fact
that the literature-based curriculum may be positively disadvantaging
some of the students in front of us is a first step to action. Renewed
recognition of the fact that speaking, listening and viewing are
the other three touch-stones of English education provides a responsible
place to begin. Introduction of strategies which empower students
to utilize their oral facility and their knowledge of their home
culture and which recognise the strengths that derive from their
cultural diversity would provide a powerful agency for increased
efficiency in our educational offerings.
REFERENCES
Anderson,
R.C., and Z. Schifirin (1980) "The meaning of words in context".
In R.J.Spiro, et al, eds., (1980) Theoretical Issues in Reading
Comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.:Erlbaum. Ausubel, D.P. (1963)
The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York:Grune
and Stratton. Angelotti, M. (1980) "Before response comes the reading:
Psycholinguistic perspectives on literature study". Unpublished
paper delivered to the 3rd International Conference on the Teaching
of English. Sydney. Applebee, A.N. (1978) The Child's Concept
of Story: Ages Two to Seventeen. Chicago: Chicago University
Press. Applebee, A.N. (1984) "Musings". In Research in the Teaching
of English , 18,3,1984. Bechervaise, N.E. (1987) Discrimination
Can't Be Taught. English in Australia 81, 44-54 Berry, M.
(1992) Learning the Paths of Narration: Stories and Storying.
Unpublished M.Ed (Hons) thesis, Townsville: James Cook University
Boomer, G. and Spender, D. (1976) The Spitting Image - Reflections
on Language, Education and Social Class. Melbourne:Rigby. Britton,
J. (1982) Prospect and Retrospect. MontClair,N.J.:Boynton/Clark.
Chall, J. (1967) Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New
York: McGraw Hill. Chan, J. (1974) Why Children Read Aloud? An
I.R.A. Micromonograph. Newark, Delaware: International Reading
Association. Clark, M.M. (1976) Young Fluent Readers. London:
Ward Lock. Cronin, M. (1986) "Reading in Inner Dublin Slum Schools".
Unpublished paper presented to the 4th International Conference
on the Teaching of English, Ottawa. Ferriero, E. and Teberosky,
A. (1982) (trans. Castro, K.G.) Literacy Before Schooling.
Exeter, New Hampshire: Heinneman. Gilbert, P. & Taylor, S (1991)
Fashioning the Feminine: Girls, Popular Culture and Schooling.
Sydney: Allen & Unwin Goodman, K. (1976) "You can get back
to Kansas any time you want to, Dorothy". N.C.E.T. Newsletter
#4. A.C.T., A.I.P. Heath, S.B. (1983) Ways With Words.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Meek, M. (1982) Learning
to Read. London:Bodley Head. Meek, M. (1988) How Texts Teach
What Children Learn. Glos.:Thimble. Miller, J and Gildea, M
(1987) "How Children Learn Words". Scientific American. 257,
3, 86-91. Piaget, J. (1952) The Origins of Intelligence in Children.
New York: International Universities Press. Purves, A.C., Foshay,
A.W. and Hansson, G. (1973) Literature Education in Ten Countries.
Stockholm: Halsted Press. Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978) The Reader,
the Text, the Poem. U.S.A.:Southern Illinois Press. Ruddock,
P.M. (1985) Aboriginal Education: House of Representatives Select
Committee on Aboriginal Education. Canberra: A.G.P.S. Snowball,
D. (ed.) (1982) Helping Your Child to Read. Melbourne: Nelson.
Sutcliffe, D. (1982) British Black English. Oxford:Basil
Blackwell. Toomey, D. (1987) "Parental competence and the new school
councils". The Educational Magazine. 41, 1, 9-11. Trelease,
J. (1984) The Read-aloud Handbook. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Ward, G. (1982) "From the beginning". In Snowball, D. (ed.),Melbourne:Nelson.
Wells, C.G. and Nicholls, J. (eds.) (1985) Language and Learning:
An International Perspective. U.K.: Falmer. Williams, G. (1990)
"Is learning to read a natural activity", Education Australia
9, 1990, 10-11.
Websites
developed - Academic index
- Biography - Contact
|