Dr
Neil Béchervaise
NB
Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd
Action
research and its application in a business based organisational
setting
Dulmanis,
P., McKenzie, K., Krooglik, W., Pejnovic, D.
©
1999
Abstract
The
paper briefly overviews the use of Action Research (AR) methodology
with an emphasis on its potential application in the business setting.
From its effective beginnings and the work of Lewin, AR has been extensively
used in the area of behavioral science. As a phenomenological based
methodology it can be associated with a number of other qualitative
research methods including case study, ethnography, grounded theory,
hermeneutics and participative enquiry. Its use in the government
and institutional sectors does not appear to be matched by its application
in the broader business and organisational context where issues such
as market share, profits, operations management, productivity and
financial management are issues of paramount importance (Gummesson,
1991). Given its applied research approach, AR has the potential to
be an important business research tool in its own right or in conjunction
with one or more other qualitative methodologies.
Applying
Action Research to a Business - Based Organisational Setting
AR does not have a prescriptive methodology, but has prevailing
methods such as placing an emphasis on practical problems in social
science with a commitment to collaboration.
The
characteristics of the most common types of AR can be summarised
as (Neuman, 1997):
i. Those being studied or the objects of the research participate
in the research process.
ii. Research incorporates ordinary or popular knowledge.
iii. Research focuses on power with a goal to empowerment.
iv. Research seeks to raise awareness.
v. Research is tied directly to political action.
To meet its goals of research and action, researchers try to equalise
power relationships between themselves and the research subjects.
They advance or improve the conditions of the subjects by empowering
them to learn and take actions for improvement. Since the solution
is tested, by acting on it, to see whether it produces the consequences
it implies, action research, unites thinking and doing or theory
and practice (Susman and Evered, 1978).
Potential
attraction for business organizations
This immediacy of AR where knowledge is gained by linking with the
role of the subject and converted to action usually in attempting
to solve poorly structured problems, make it appear attractive for
problematical situations in social systems such as organisational
change programs in business.
However the use of AR in business, introduces potential complications
and complexities. For example unlike other research methodologies
where the entire research project is controlled by the researcher
or practitioner, an AR project is an alliance or partnership between
possibly four groups:
i. The sponsor ii. The practitioner iii. The research subjects iv.
The scientific community
Like all true partnerships, this ideally infers consensus on goals
and clarity of purpose, equal power, control and decision - making.
These would appear to be achievable for the highly participative
community social political action or classroom projects covered
by much of the AR literature, such as feminist or environmental
issues or oppressed minority causes. The position changes when business
norms are added However typical business norms or imperatives would
most likely be included into any substantive organisational AR project.
These imperatives could include predefined project outcomes, value
for money or payback for the sponsor, concern for totally open empowerment
of the participants and the ethics and ultimate confidentiality
of intimate project knowledge of data. The introduction of these
would appear to immediately cause contention with an open sharing,
collaborative AR project where outcomes are vague and the research
focus and methodology require new definition as the project and
findings evolve. This appears to introduce major complexity for
any level of collaborative partnership between the four partners
identified.
Summary
recommendations
To minimise compromise and confusion of purpose within a broad stakeholder
community, a business focused action research project can be considered
as two projects: i. An action research ideology project ii. A thesis
research methodology.
Essentially one variant of the project meets Organisational Development
(OD), change agent or consulting goals and the other meets the needs
of a rigorous thesis research methodology. Instead of one unlikely,
compromised, partnership between four stakeholders, two collaborative
special purpose partnerships are developed. The research problem
or question may differ with a subset of the overall project actions
or solutions used for the research. The project write up for the
thesis purpose would most likely contain greater insights to the
methodology used, reflections on findings and their broader research
implications rather than the solutions or actions. The OD or consulting
project report may follow conventions for a management or executive
recommendation. Eden and Huxham (1997) provide a comprehensive outline
along with a series of guidelines for the need to separate AR research
objectives from consulting or OD objectives.
Further
Action Research Readings and Reference Article Summaries
The
following summaries provide a broad range of AR overviews as well
as social and business applications within the government, institutional
and business sectors.
Aguinis, H. (1993) "Action Research and Scientific Method: Presumed
Discrepancies and Actual Similarities" in Journal of Applied Behavioral
Research, Dec. 93, Vol. 29, Issue 4, pp.416-432.
This article attempts to bridge the action research methodology
and scientific method methodology by reviewing their common roots
and by analysing the assumptions underlying three frequently noted
discrepancy between the two forms of enquiry: 1. The treatment of
(multivariate) causality 2. The setting of the experiment or intervention
(Field versus laboratory) and the use of a control group 3. The
use of qualitative versus quantitative data.
The evidence presented suggests that despite the differences between
AR and SM, these three presumed discrepancies are actually similarities.
In addition, AR and SM seem to be less distant philosophically than
some recent comparisons have recognised. The article provides a
good brief summary of both methods before highlighting the differences
based upon literature review. The author then focuses upon the three
above key areas to examine where apparent differences can be seen
as similarities. This article is useful to gain a fuller understanding
of the action research (and scientific methodology) and provides
a solid bibliography to act as a launching pad for further reading.
Clark, Peter A. (1972) "Action Research and Organisational Change"
Harper & Row, London.
This
book, although a little dated, has some valuable insights into the
use of the behavioral sciences to facilitate organisational change.
In particular it focuses on action research as a strategy for facilitating
and learning about organisational change. Clark contends that "the
context of the organisation into which an innovation is being introduced
requires careful mapping to reveal its actual structural and attitudinal
profile so that the method of implementing the innovation can be
matched to the situation", and provides some insight on this matter.
In relation to organisational change, he discusses the controversies
on issues such as selecting points of intervention, characteristics
of problem ownership and degree of formalisation of the problems.
He presents seven case studies that illustrate different approaches
to organisational change. Discussion is given on the role of the
sponsors and that of the practitioners who undertake parts of the
diagnosis and change program. A collaborative model for this relationship
is tendered. The role of the practitioner is vital for it may determine
the point of intervention and the process of action research.
Cunningham, J.Barton, (1995) "Strategic Considerations in Using
Action Research for Improving Personnel Practices". Public Personnel
Management, Winter 95, Vol. 24, Issue 4, p515.
The paper examines the achievements and the action research methodology
used to improve human resource procedures and managerial practices
in a Canadian community services organization over a period of fifteen
months. The discussion covers the broad concepts and methodology
behind action research but its main focus is grounded in the practical
application and the final outcomes of the process itself. These
include the development of job descriptions, a performance appraisal
system, a strategic plan, an integrative employee relations process
and a team management process. The paper emphasizes the importance
of identifying and selecting the appropriate strategic approach
and choice in terms of addressing a number of issues. These included,
top versus bottom-up change, information gathering versus facilitation,
changing people versus organizational structures, resolving technical
versus people problems, using power versus a participatory approach
and defining the relationship between organizational versus active
research activities. Overall, the paper provided an extremely practical
and relevant template for using the active research process in a
particular environment to generate a number of successful outcomes.
Eden, C. and Huxham, C. (1997) "Action Research for the Study of
Organizations" in Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C & Nord, W. R. (ed), Handbook
of Organizational Studies, Sage Publications, London.
While action research is gaining popularity as a research method
to study organizations, it may in fact be gaining negative connotations
from its loose definition, wide ranging use, lack of repeatability
and possibly lack of rigour. The authors focus on this context by
detailing 15 characteristics that in their view can qualify an action
research project as robust research. Given the complexity and pressures
of the real world, conforming to the 15 characteristics is acknowledged
as a major challenge however the authors argue this should not be
a deterrent. This highlights some real world issues. Action researchers
are close relatives to consultants. It is highly possible that consultancy
can confuse and conflict with research standards. Academics value
their ability to consult as way of informing and legitimising their
teaching and receiving additional income. Consultancy to achieve
desired outcomes may not coincide with good research. The sponsoring
organization may be concerned with the outcome and getting value
for money and not the research. The 15 characteristics are described
in considerable detail and provide important research integrity
checkpoints, particularly for a participatory researcher also acting
as a consultant to the project under study.
Israel B.A. and Schurman, S.J. (1992) "Conducting Action Research:
Relationships Between Organisation Members and Researchers" in Journal
of Applied Behavioural Science, Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 74-102.
Action research in an organisation setting draws the researcher
and the employees involved into a joint process aimed at meeting
both research objectives and intervention objectives. This article
examines the relationship issues surrounding action research methodology
in relationship to the researcher and participants, and points out
that this relationship will have an effect on the outcome of the
research. It examines the changing nature of the relationship over
time as the research project passes through its different cycles.
The author examines role-related tensions that may arise out of
the issues of values and interests, resources and skills, control,
political reality and costs. A six-year action research project
inside an organisation was used to gather data and draw conclusions
around relationship related issues. The author concludes with practical
suggestions relating to the issues studied. In addition, the article
has a useful comprehensive summary of the action research methodology
including the issues surrounding this research type. This article
is useful for a researcher to understand the issues related to relationships
in the action research process and is recommended for any one considering
this methodology. It is available on the EBSCO host at the Swinburne
library.
Kemmis, S. (1992) "Action Research in Retrospect and Prospect" The
Action Research Reader, Deakin University.
This
article focuses on the application of action research within education.
It attempts to bridge the gap between "those who poses knowledge
which claims to be of vital importance in the development of practice
(the researcher), and those who must have it for their work". On
the one hand researchers ought to be at arms length to encourage
objectivity and on the other hand need to be involved to better
understand the lived experience that they intend to interpret. Action
research is a way of bridging this gap as it allows the researcher
to gain feedback on the interventions that may be proposed. In the
right situation, the receiver of the knowledge, in this case teachers,
can themselves function as researchers. Reference is made to the
works of Kurt Lewin, the acknowledged founder of action research
and this provides a useful historical background.
Lederman, NG. and Niess ML., "Action Research: Our Actions May Speak
Louder Than Our Words", School Science and Mathematics, December
97, Vol. 97, Issue 8, p 397.
This
article is education system based and aims to facilitate the development
of reflective practitioners who can make professional decisions
through continuing enquiry. Action research is viewed as an established
methodology for research with rigorous conventions but distinguished
from traditional research by its general purpose and the involved
role of the researcher. It alerts us to the importance of training
the novice researcher who might otherwise carry out an inadequately
designed investigation and include anecdotal data collection and
analysis. Whilst this provides good warning, the article does not
prescribe the right way. Despite its educational based leanings,
the article can provide some contribution to the researcher considering
action research.
McNiff, J. (1988) "Action Research: Principles and Practice", MacMillan
Education Publishing, UK, (Only Chapter 1 Reviewed).
The first chapter of this book introduces action research describing
it as "an increasingly popular movement in educational research".
The focus is on teaching and the educational research applications
of this methodology. It emphasises a differentiating characteristic
of the methodology with the phrase "it is research WITH, rather
than research ON". The chapter article is a good initial reading
on AR for the uninitiated as an introduction to the methodology
as the language is plain and simple, apparently focused upon an
audience of practicing teachers interested in using this approach
for the first time. It would be of little value for researchers
already well versed in the methodology.
McTaggart, R. (1992) "Action Research: Issues in Theory and Practice"
Keynote address to the Methodological Issues in Qualitative Health
Research Conference, November 27,1992, Deakin University Geelong.
The paper provides a brief but definitive overview of the historical
evolution and broader meaning of "action research" from its earliest
identifiable beginnings in 1913 and the work of J.L. Moreno to its
evolution and recognition as a research methodology through the
efforts and contribution of K. Lewin. Of particular interest is
the intellectual and practical examination of the traditional concept
of "action research" in the Lewinian tradition and the newer concept
of "participatory action research". The paper touches on the differences
between "knowledge production" through action research and the concepts
of action learning. The author provides a useful overview of the
more salient traditional and post modern criticisms of action research
whilst at the same time pointing out the benefits of the methodology
through citing specific action research projects and their outcomes.
The paper is of great benefit in terms of its overall incisive but
thorough approach to examining and defining the concepts, evolution
and benefits of "action research" methodology.
Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (1980) "The Case for Qualitative Research",
Journal of Management Review, vol.5 , No. 4, pp. 491 Š 500.
Within the debated divide between quantitative and quantitative
research methods, Morgan and Smircich argue that the dichotomy between
the two rival methods is rough and oversimplified. In their view
the debate is not about the choice of adequacy of the right method
for collecting and analysing data, but understanding the researcherÕs
core assumptions about the nature of the phenomena to be investigated.
These phenomena are human nature, ontology or the theory of reality,
epistemology or the study of gaining knowledge and methodology.
The phenomena are categorised into a spectrum of views about human
beings and their world as held by social scientists from early history
(Plato, Descartes etc.) through to the currently repeated challenges
between the "scientific" view of knowledge and the "humanistic"
one. Morgan and Smircich depict this spectrum in a table with subjective
approaches (learning from senses or experiences) at one extreme
and objective at the other (I believe there is an answer). As researchers
we have a choice about how we view our subject of study. If we view
it within an objective or concrete process frame, then this infers
a closed world with network of determinate relationships that allow
accurate observation and measurement (a machine metaphor). This
position infers an appropriate use of quantitative methods as used
in natural sciences and translated into social science context.
Towards the other end of the spectrum, the ontological assumptions
are relaxed and the world is viewed in a frame where the subjects
of study are not only difficult to measure accurately but also contribute
to changes in a surrounding open environment. This infers that different
approaches for research and study are required that possibly tend
towards qualitative methods. This paper strongly puts forward the
case for aligning the research method to the chosen view or assumptions
held by the researcher. The spectrum concept reinforces the view
that the categories are not distinct binary definitions or boundaries
and therefore the research method decision need not also be a binary
choice between quantitative and qualitative.
Prideaux, G. (1990) "Action Research, Organisation Change and Management
Development", Australian Health Review, vol. 13, No. 1.
Action research simultaneously combines action with research. Prideaux
stresses the point that action research and its family member, action
learning are powerful activities that should be used in organisational
settings rather than educational institutions. He presents a simple
diagram that defines its objectives in this setting. From his experiences
in working with action research to effect change within organisational
settings, Prideaux alludes to the difficulties of linking management
responsibility with effective action research based programs due
to impacts such as multiple sources of change and in his reported
case a "loosely coupled" organisational structure which complicated
coordination and control. Other impacts include dealing with the
shadow side of organizations and the priority given towards technical
systems change over the accompanying human or people change issues.
Practical experience added further insights to theory such as: §
Because real change in real organisations is involved, the research
needs to be dynamic as many events are not predictable. § The "Kolb
Learning Loop" framework becomes a continual adaptive non - linear
process. § Not much stands still long enough for it to be observed
in detail. This makes quantitative approaches based upon manipulating
one variable while fixing everything else difficult. Practicality
then focuses towards descriptive methodologies over measurement.
§ Action research tends towards improving the immediate understanding
of a practical concept or problem. This need to satisfy a sponsor
should not overwhelm the need to maintain a rigorous valid research
and analysis methodology.
The article provides useful practical insights highlighting that
both research integrity and flexibility and adaptability need to
prevail. Change and uncertainty, which are likely to be the focus
of the research, will also impact the project itself.
Winter,
R. (1989). "Action Research and the Nature of Social Inquiry: Professional
Innovation and Educational Work", Aldershot, Avebury.
The text questions and challenges the application and validity of
action research in the context of social inquiry. The author seeks
to define and establish a "theoretical elaboration of action researcherÕs
own mode of inquiry" in order to emphasize its applicability as
a key methodology in social sciences research. In addition, the
author raises and argues a number of epistemological and ontological
positions as prerequisite suppositions in support of action research
and the broader process of social inquiry. The text and the action
research narrative is subdivided into four broad themes covering
the issues of action and research, critical self-reflection, improvement
of professional practice and the problems of validity. The discussion
is detailed with a heavy emphasis on critical examination of a number
of concepts and established works in the field of action research.
Overall, the work presents a detailed approach in terms of supporting
and establishing action research as a relevant and key tool in social
research. The text has a strong educational research emphasis but
nevertheless does address and cover a range of issues in relation
to action research and its broader relevance as an important research
methodology.
References
Eden, C. and Huxham, C. (1997), "Action Research for the Study of
Organizations" in Clegg, S.R., Hardy, C & Nord, W. R. (ed), Handbook
of Organizational Studies, Sage Publications, London.
Gummesson, E. (1991), "Qualitative Methods in Management Research"
Sage Publications, London.
Neuman, L. W., (1997), "Social Research Methods", Allyn & Bacon,
MA, USA.
Susman, G.I. and Evered, R. D. (1978), "An assessment of the scientific
merits of action research" in Administrative Science Quarterly,
23: pp. 582 Š 603.
Websites
developed - Academic index
- Biography - Contact
|