Dr
Neil Béchervaise
NB
Consulting (Australasia) Pty Ltd
Narrative
Analysis
Sally
Eastoe, Joel Haire, & Alan Rees ©1999
Introduction
Narrative analysis
is a qualitative research method. Polkinghorne (1988) states that
narrative is the fundamental scheme for linking individual human actions
and events into interrelated aspects of an understandable composite.
Narrative analysis
is a first-person account by respondents of their experience in
relation to a nominated subject. This particular research method
assesses how respondents in the course of an interview make sense
of questions and comments raised in relation to events and actions
in their lives. This research approach is therefore well suited
to studies that are based around identity and subjectivity.
What About
Narrative Analysis?
This research
process is based upon different primary experiences: attending,
telling, transcribing, analysing, and reading. The limitation we
have with these forms of representation is that they all have text
and talk that may either represent partly, selectively, or imperfectly
part of the story.
Narrative analysis
allows the researcher to see how respondents impose their order
on experience and environment by commenting upon their relationships
between events and actions through stories. Therefore, narrative
enables the researcher to identify the transitional stages leading
to a given situation, and to identify similarities and differences
between groups.
A researcher
would use this research method if they wish to gain a rich perspective,
holistic, and dynamic view of their subject matter.
Structure of
Narratives
Drawing from
the seminal work of Labov (1969), Langellier (1989) reiterates that
each narrative has formal properties, and a complete narrative has
six key components: 1.An abstract (summary of the narrative); 2.
Orientation (time, place, situation, participants); 3. Complicating
action (sequence of events); 4. Evaluation (significance and meaning
of the action, attitude of the narrator); 5. Resolution (what finally
happened), and 6. Coda (returns the perspective to the present).
Limitations
of Narrative Analysis
This research
method has limitations in the following situations:
Studies of large
numbers;
Researchers
who seek an uncomplicated view of subjects; and
Where attention
is required to understand subtleties of the information gathered.
The information
gathered and analysed through this research approach may see interpretations
distorted by subjectivity as to an understanding the key issues,
subject manipulation, self-selection of target audience, and generalisation
of results.
Narrative Analysis
in a Business Context
Introduction
This section
offers suggestions about where narrative analysis could be used
in a business context and the links between narrative analysis as
a methodology and organisation dynamics.
Narrative analysis
is concerned with the recording and interpreting of stories. Subjects
are asked to relate stories about a topic, to the researcher, in
an attempt to explain phenomena in the subjectÕs life. Since stories
are ubiquitous in social contexts (people relate experiences to
each other through stories) and stories are used to structure meaning
from experience (people tell themselves stories) narrative analysis
can be used widely.
This is an
abductive (inductive) approach. Thus, this research method is useful
in developing new hypothesis to explain shared or different perspectives
and to explain how these perspectiveÕs evolved over time. For example,
this approach may be suitable to support research that examines
the unconscious aspects of organisational life, culture, leadership,
power and conflict. In todayÕs changing world the issues that are
central to organisational life such as managing change in a complex
environment need to be understood from a dynamic perspective. We
would therefore argue that narrative analysis lends itself to the
research of organisational phenomena of this nature.
Narrative analysis
provides subjects with the opportunity to tell a story in order
for the researcher to understand the interdependency between numerous
social factors and the changes that underpin the complexity of the
organisational environment.
Organisations
as systems have become a favoured way for academics and practitioners
to understand organisation dynamics. A systems perspective lends
itself to a qualitative method of research, and to be understood
holistically requires that the researcher investigate the human
dynamics that impact, as well as the process, systems and feedback
loops. Narrative therefore allows the researcher to draw upon a
far greater range of issues in either testing or explaining a hypothesis
or organisational problem.
Since narrative
frames reality in the context of an individual or groups perspective,
this enables us to understand what is required to change the story,
so an organisation can influence its future (Riessman, 1993). Therefore
narrative analysis could be said to intrinsically embrace the issues
associated with change since all theories are in fact narratives.
Fundamentally
narrative is about the telling and analysis of stories, it therefore
can be interpreted that all business theorists (e.g. Porter, Ansoff,
and Adizes) influence the individual narratives of organisations
if they adopt their theories as their own. This argument supports
the view that narrative analysis as a method of research can be
applied to organisations in general.
Application
to Organisational Research
Holistic
"The narrative
scheme serves as a lens through which the apparently independent
and disconnected elements of existence are seen as related parts
of a whole" (Barry & Elmes 1997, p3). Therefore narrative enables
the researcher to gather and analyse information from multiple dimensions
and has the capacity to present the relatedness between interdependencies.
This methodology
enables the researcher to synergise and bring together a number
of key elements when approaching or analysing an organisational
problem, or testing a hypothesis which contributes to presenting
a holistic way of understanding a particular organisational issue.
Conflicting
Views
Since narratives are fundamentally abductive it allows for different
views to emerge. This method allows the researcher to study interdependent
issues, and from this explore and analyse differences that impact
upon organisational performance.
"Narrative
stories express multiple, possibly conflicting viewpoints, these
are often choral-like, three dimensional, self-reflexive, and dynamic."
(Barry & Elmes 1997, p.13) In todayÕs changing world managers are
faced with managing in ambiguity and paradox, which requires a research
methodology that can deal with uncertainties. The breadth, complexity
and richness of stories offer a holistic way of collecting data.
Changing
Context
Organisational phenomena, such as leadership, strategic management,
culture and change are narratives that have an historical context,
which are quantifiable and measurable. When understood from a dynamic
perspective differing and new narratives do emerge. Narrative analysis
encompasses both the told and the telling. This implies that narrative
not only addresses the present reality but it also shapes future
direction.
Let us consider
organisational strategy as an example. Traditionally, strategy is
a story of the past and the expected future that is usually articulated
through text and performance objectives for key stakeholders. Narrative
analysis provides a medium for an organisation to express their
current reality, and the multiple stories that describe and predict
their future (Barry & Elmes, 1997).
"This has powerful
implications for organisations in a future context as they move
away from Ôindividual, monologicalÕ organisations (Gergen, 1995)
to ÔvirtualÕ or Ôthrow-awayÕ ones (March 1995)" (Barry & Elmes,
1997). These discard organizations will require narratives that
can cope with blurred organisational boundaries (Hirschhorn & Gilmore,
1992).
Complexity
TodayÕs organisations are becoming more and more complex. Roles
have greater breadth of responsibility and boundaries less clear.
The speed and amount of change is increasing. This has implications
for the researcher, as this requires a methodological approach to
reality that is emergent.
Since the ontology
of narrative analysis takes the view that reality is created by
individuals and group stories, narrative analysis therefore takes
care of these requirements of complexity from a research perspective.
As a research method it can allow respondents to express greater
feelings, celebration, individuality. This opens the argument that
stories connect with the experiences of organisational life that
to the future might look like and transform existing paradigms (Barry
& Elmes 1997, p.11).
Dynamic
We have already suggested that narrative gives the researcher a
view of the organisation from either an individual or group perspective.
This may be different based upon their own frame of reference and
their perception of the current status of their internal and external
environments. These narratives will change as these environments
evolve, and at the same time these internal and external environments
will change based upon the influence of these narratives. As a research
method, therefore narrative in itself is dynamic.
This method
requires the researcher to ask the respondents to verify their stories.
In turn this provides feedback to the organisation through the respondents,
who not only, validate the research method, but also provide a dynamic
process where stories become changed. As we change our stories we
change the organisation.
Limitations
of Narrative Analysis in Business Research
Listed below
are the limitations of narrative analysis in the context of business
related research: Predominant research history in social sciences
in preference to business;
Not necessarily
applicable across organisations, findings are not easily generalised;
Requires other
research methodologies to support overall analysis of a given subject;
and
Our research
has shown that narrative analysis has been used predominantly to
research the social sciences, and that minimal research has been
undertaken using this methodology in a business context. Historically
the two disciplines have been considered to require different philosophies
and ways of thinking, consequently scientific methods of research
have been seen as the preferred and more valid method in the business
field.
Developments
in organisational theories have bought both disciplines closer together,
however narrative analysis, which occupies the extreme of the qualitative
and subjective continuum, is still seen as problematic in terms
of finding the "truth". In a business world that is driven by the
Ôbottom lineÕ there is still a tendency to favour research methods
that are more quantifiable.
Qualitative
method, and narrative in particular is concerned with the depth
of the subjects experiences and interpretations. This, together
with the fact that data is drawn from a relatively small number
of subjects makes it more difficult to generalise and compare results
across organisations.
It is generally
accepted that narrative analysis has limitations as a research methodology,
and that additional research methods are required to provide a more
complete picture of the information given. In the business context
this will mean additional time and costs to confirm findings.
Narrative as
a Research Method: Papers of Interest
1. Pugh, Deborah,
The Use of the Qualitative Case Study Approach as a Way of Integrating
Research
and Practice in Counselling Psychology, Counselling Psychology Quarterly,
Sep 98, Vol.11 Issue 3, p257
This article demonstrates the use of narrative analysis in the context
of a case study. The strength of this article in relation to narrative
is that: It shows how by examining the choice of words and selection
of phrases how a relationship can be understood as a dynamic and
how the relationship changes; Identifies themes across relationships;
By examining the language the author demonstrates how people can
construct their narrative to serve a particular purpose. Although
the example is in a counselling context it could easily be transferred
to explore relationships in any setting. It is also a clear, simple
practical example of narrative analysis.
2. Barry, David;
Elms, Michael, Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic
discourse,
Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, Mississippi
State; Apr 1997.
This article
uses narrative theory, to explore strategic management as a form
of fiction. It introduces several key narrative concepts, and the
challenge strategists have faced in making strategic discourse both
credible and novel. It also considers how narratives may change
within the virtual organisation of the future. Victor Shklovsky
first put forth the narrative model that is explained. (whose ideas
were further developed by other members of the Russian Formalist
circle; cf. Ann Bowlt, 1973; Lemon & Reis, 1965; Matejka & Pomorska,
1971). It is a deceptively simple approach w underpins several other
narrative frameworks, thus providing a possible foundation for future
work. It can also be applied to many kinds of narrative, an important
point given that strategic discourse tends to adopt a variety of
forms. The model contends with credibility and defamiliarisation.
For strategy to be successful it needs to be believable and change
perception. Both of these are dealt with in depth. It also discusses
what forms narratives might take when contending with strategy in
relation to the virtual organisation of the future. The strength
of this article is that it places the use of narrative theory firmly
in the realm of business as opposed to the fields of psychology,
sociology or feminist theory. By working with narrative in the context
of strategy it place narrative theory in what might be considered
to be the core of organisational functioning. Although this article
does not deal with narrative in the context of research it demonstrates
how narrative contributes to organisational development in a powerful
way. From this assumptions could be made about how narrative as
a method of research could be used in a business setting.
3. Bailey,
Patricia Hill, Assuring Quality in Narrative Analysis, Western Journal
of Nursing Research,
Apr 96, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p186-189.
This article
is of particular interest as it deals with qualitative research
and narrative analysis in the medical profession where scientific
research methods have been traditionally valued. It clarifies what
the terms quality, trustworthiness, credibility, authenticity, and
goodness mean in qualitative research findings. The process of assuring
quality and validation, in qualitative research are discussed within
the context of the interpretive method, narrative analysis. The
strength of this article is that it deals with the issue of validity
in relation to qualitative research method. It links the interpretive
approach with an interest in meaning rather than truth and specifically
refers to narrative analysis in this context.
4. Lempert,
Lora Bex, Narrative Analysis of Abuse, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
Jan 94,
Vol. 22 Issue 4, p 411-342.
Narrative analysis
as described in this article endeavours to interpret the feelings
and reactions of an individual in a physically and mentally abused
relationship. It focuses on the internal logic of this narrative
as it is relayed to the reader through grammatical structures and
word selection. This approach was used to uncover the multiple meanings
that emanate from a person in terms of their frame of reference
as a partner, mother, and an individual in the context of social
structures, historical, and public perceptions. This analysis helps
the reader understand how the person experiencing this abuse was
able to react and later transform while interacting with her psychological,
physical, social and cultural environment Lempert (1994). Narrative
analysis focuses on the "how" of lived experience and the causal
"why", analysis is framed interactionally and attempts to unravel
the multiple meanings that derive from interactional events while
simultaneously seeking to examine the social text presented in the
personal narrative Denzin (1989). The strength of this article is
that it was able to demonstrate to the reader how narratives evolve
and their impact upon research.
5. Atkinson,
Paul, Narrative Turn or Blind Alley, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
Aug 97,
Vol. 7 Issue 3, p 325-344
This article
is a commentary on narrative analysis in the context of qualitative
research in medical studies. The basic premise of this article is
that narrative analysis should be built into a systematic approach
and should not be the sole method of assessment when investigating
the multiple issues related to a given subject. This article demonstrates
that narrative is an authentic account of a given subject, where
storytelling is used to represent reality. It deals with the notion
that where narrative is used to promote one view of culture it is
using narrative in reductionist way. To overcome this article suggests
that thick description should be used to provide multiple perspectives.
6. Polkinghorne,
David. E, Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, State University
of New York
Press, Albany, NY, 1988.
This paper
is an attempt to explain narrative. The proposition is that narrative
consists of two elements: a scheme that links actions and events,
which is primarily concerned with the connectivity between them.
Secondarily this article examines how linguistic is a form of expression
of the meaning contained in narrative. It suggests that narrative
are pervasive and can be divided into subjects and can accommodate
and generate an infinite variety of specific stories. It draws on
suppositions about human experience and uses the narrative scheme
to compare and contrast narrative against paradigmatic mode. Narrative
is described as the connections between events and paradigmatic
mode is the search from truth. In this chapter the author suggests
that the plot is central to narrative theory and provides the organising
theme through chronicled events. The plot constructs the realm for
meaning to be expressed and the interpretation of the relationship
between perceptions and the events. It also considers the impact
of culture on the plot. Narrative theory is concerned with the explanation
of the complexity of events rather than the demonstration of what
has occurred. The benefit of this chapter for the researcher is
that it provides depth of understanding of the construction of narratives.
7. Blyler,
Nancy & Perkins, Jane, Culture and the Power of Narrative, Journal
of Business and
Technical Communication, July 99, Vol. 13 No. 3, p. 245 - 248.
This article
explores the linkage between culture and the concept of narrative
analysis. Narratives are used to make meaning of knowledge and experience
in the context of an organisations culture. The use of narrative
analysis is used to overcome the binary approach of western thought
and provide a more enriched understanding of organisational culture.
Narratives are demonstrated as being the process of drawing together
organisational thought in a given area, e.g. Bank of Canada. Stories
are central in providing meaning to organisations. Scientific narratives
enable scientists to give meaning to scientific work, and to fully
explain limitations within their work. Narratives are seen as being
important in expanding the existing boundaries of communication
for results and activities. The strength of this article is that
it demonstrates the relationship between narratives and culture
in an organisational setting.
8. Stevenson,
W. B., Greenburg, D. N. The Formal Analysis of Narratives of Organizational
Behaviour
Journal of Management Nov-Dec 1998 v24 i6 p741 (2)
These authors
argue that historically, narrative analysis developed as an interpretive
technique with a strong emphasis on what the narrative explained
rather than how the events in the narrative were related in a cause
and effect relationship. This emphasis, the authors feel, leaves
narrative analysis unable to support the development of effective
and sustainable generalizations. Their answer to this challenge
is to introduce the concept of narrative positivism. Narrative positivism
according to the authors; "...differs from these techniques
in its desire to link events to other events, determine which events
precipitated other events, and produce consistent inferences through
the use of formal rules that allow replication and generaliazability"(1998
p744) In order to satisfactorily carry out narrative positivism
the authors introduce a tool. A computer program called ETHNO. This
tool is based on Event Structure Analysis (ESA). In turn ESA is
based on "formal mathematical logic" (1998 p745) The ESA approach
sequences events and constructs cause and effect relationships between
them. It attempts to identify critical points in the narrative when
the flow changes. The program itself produces a diagram, which is
used in the explanation process. The paper elaborates on the application
of the technique with an analysis of the mobilization of a city
council in response to environmental pressure groups. The use of
the approach proposed in this paper is that it is dependent on the
researcherÕs philosophy. Is the social world capable of being reduced
to cause and effect relationships or is the reductionist approach
going to ignore the subjective interpretation (or misinterpretation)
of reality by social actors and the distortion of cause and effect
by this subjectivity?
9. Labov W.
Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis, http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~labov/sfs.html
Labov, in this
article, give a brief history of how and why using a narrative develops
narrative analysis! The article does not stop at this point but
continues on to raise two important issues. The first of these issues
relates to the proof value of narrative analysis. "The discussion
of narrative and other speech events at the discourse level rarely
allows us to prove anything." The second relates to the usefulness
of narrative analysis. "The most important data that I have gathered
on narrative is not drawn from the observation of speech production
or controlled experiments, but from the reactions of audiences to
the narratives as I have retold them"
In addition
to raising and discussing these two issues, Labov discusses further
the following areas, which can be analysed in narrative; 1. temporal
organisation
2. reportability
3. credibility
4. objectivity
5. causality
6. assignment of blame and praise
For the serious researcher using the technique this is a must read
article!
10. Shorter
Worktime Network of Canada. Narrative Policy Analysis
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/narrate.htm18/799
This article
refers to a book by Emery Roe called Narrative Policy Analysis.
In this book, it states, Roe specifies four steps for narrative
policy analysis
1. Identify policy narratives that dominate the issue under investigation
2. Identify other narratives that counter the dominant themes
3. Compare the two sets and develop a meta-narrative from both
4. Determine if the meta-narrative can recast issues in an attempt
to make it more palatable to policy makers
This list suggests
a very practical application of narrative analysis it indicates
how narrative analysis can be used to redefine actions. Thus the
text would appear to be worth reading.
Bibliography
Atkinson, Paul,
"Narrative Turn or Blind Alley", Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,
Aug 97, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p 325, 20 p.
Bailey, Patricia Hill, "Assuring Quality in Narrative Analysis",
Western Journal of Nursing Research, Apr 96, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p186,
9.
Barry, David; Elms, Michael, "Strategy retold: Toward a narrative
view of strategic discourse", Academy of Management. The Academy
of Management Review, Mississippi State; Apr 1997.
Blyler, Nancy & Perkins, Jane, "Culture and the Power of Narrative",
Journal of Business and Technical Communication, July 99, Vol. 13
No. 3, p. 245 - 248.
Labov W. "Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis", http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~labov/sfs.html
Labov and Waletzky (1972) Language in the inner city
Lempert, Lora Bex, "Narrative Analysis of Abuse", Journal of Contemporary
Ethnography,Jan 94, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p 411, 31.
Polkinghorne, David. E, "Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences",
State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1988.
Pugh, Deborah, "The Use of the Qualitative Case Study Approach as
a Way of Integrating Research and Practice in Counselling Psychology",
Counselling Psychology Quarterly, Sep 98, Vol.11 Issue 3, p257.
Riessman, C., K. Narrative Analysis, Sage Publications, USA, 1993.
Shorter Worktime Network of Canada. "Narrative Policy Analysis"
http://www.vcn.bc.ca/timework/narrate.htm18/799
Stevenson, W. B.& Greenburg, D. N. "The Formal Analysis of Narratives
of Organizational Behaviour" Journal of Management Nov-Dec 1998
v24 i6 p741 (2)
Websites
developed - Academic index
- Biography - Contact
|